Article Detail Page

Balanced Scorecard Analysis of Ghana's Galamsey Problem under the 4th Republic

A critical analysis of Ghana's galamsey issue using the Balanced Scorecard framework. Explore the financial, environmental, and enforcement gaps and find solutions to address this national crisis.

Highlights:

  • A multi-dimensional analysis of Ghana's galamsey problem using the balanced scorecard framework.
  • Identification of performance gaps in legislative, economic, environmental, and enforcement perspectives.
  • Strategic recommendations for addressing the galamsey issue through a balanced approach.

Balanced Scorecard Analysis of Ghana's Galamsey Problem under the 4th Republic


Highlights

  • A multi-dimensional analysis of Ghana's galamsey problem using the balanced scorecard framework.
  • Identification of performance gaps in legislative, economic, environmental, and enforcement perspectives.
  • Strategic recommendations for addressing the galamsey issue through a balanced approach.

Research Methodology

This article applies the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework, originally developed by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, to analyze Ghana's galamsey problem. The BSC model offers a holistic approach by examining the issue from four critical perspectives: Financial, Customer (Citizen), Internal Processes, and Learning & Growth. This methodology draws upon governmental data, academic research, environmental reports, and policy reviews to assess gaps and provide actionable recommendations.


Top 10 Key Statistics and Facts

  1. $2.3 billion in estimated tax revenue lost due to illegal mining between 2009 and 2018 (IMF).
  2. 33% of Ghana’s total land area is affected by degradation caused by galamsey (EPA Ghana).
  3. Over 70% of water bodies in Ghana are polluted by illegal mining activities (Ghana Water Company).
  4. 2.5 million Ghanaians are either directly or indirectly engaged in galamsey activities (Minerals Commission).
  5. 25% reduction in cocoa yields in regions impacted by galamsey (Ghana Cocoa Board).
  6. Over 10,000 foreigners, primarily from China, have been implicated in illegal mining operations (Ghana Immigration Service).
  7. Ghana's forestry cover loss due to illegal mining exceeds 2 million hectares since 1990 (Forestry Commission).
  8. The conviction rate for galamsey offenders is less than 5%, despite numerous arrests (Transparency International).
  9. An estimated $1 billion is required for environmental reclamation in galamsey-affected areas (Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources).
  10. $50 million worth of equipment seized by the National Anti-Galamsey Task Force over the past five years (Ghana Police Service).

Body of Article/Critical Analysis

1. Financial Perspective

The financial ramifications of galamsey in Ghana are staggering. The country loses substantial revenue from illegal mining, including billions in unpaid taxes, royalties, and other mining-related fees. From a balanced scorecard viewpoint, this represents a failure in achieving economic stability, as the financial benefits of legalizing small-scale mining or implementing effective taxation mechanisms remain unrealized.

In addition, galamsey has inflicted severe damage on agricultural productivity, particularly cocoa farming. Cocoa, a critical export commodity, has seen yields drop in regions affected by illegal mining. This threatens the long-term financial health of Ghana's economy, contributing to reduced foreign exchange earnings and increased environmental costs.

2. Customer (Citizen) Perspective

From the citizen’s perspective, galamsey has had a detrimental impact on public health, livelihood, and access to natural resources. The contamination of water bodies, deforestation, and loss of arable land have directly affected communities, particularly in rural areas where agriculture and fishing are essential for survival.

The government's inability to effectively mitigate these impacts undermines citizen confidence in the state's capacity to protect their rights and resources. Under the 4th Republic, efforts such as Operation Vanguard, though visible, have not succeeded in reassuring citizens that their land and water are safeguarded against the effects of illegal mining.

3. Internal Processes Perspective

Internal governmental processes to combat galamsey, including legislation and enforcement, have encountered significant shortcomings. Laws such as the Minerals and Mining Act (2006) and anti-galamsey task forces have been created to curb illegal mining activities. However, enforcement has been inconsistent due to corruption, weak institutional capacity, and lack of coordination among law enforcement bodies.

The inefficient judicial processes have further exacerbated the situation. Less than 5% of arrested offenders are convicted, illustrating a systemic issue in holding perpetrators accountable. This gap reflects a lack of robust internal processes that are essential for sustainable governance.

4. Learning & Growth Perspective

Addressing galamsey from a learning and growth perspective requires investing in education, awareness programs, and technological advancements. There has been a limited focus on educating local communities about the long-term impacts of illegal mining on their environment and health.

Moreover, technological gaps in monitoring mining activities remain significant. Drones, satellite imaging, and real-time data analytics, which could help track and combat illegal mining, are underutilized. There is also a lack of innovation in developing alternative livelihoods for populations reliant on galamsey, preventing the shift to more sustainable economic activities.


Current Top 10 Factors Impacting Ghana’s Galamsey Problem

  1. Weak enforcement of mining laws and corruption in task forces.
  2. Foreign involvement in illegal mining, particularly by Chinese nationals.
  3. Severe environmental degradation affecting agriculture, water bodies, and ecosystems.
  4. Judicial inefficiencies, leading to low conviction rates for illegal miners.
  5. Lack of economic alternatives for communities reliant on illegal mining.
  6. Corruption within local government and enforcement agencies.
  7. Poor community engagement in mining governance and land-use decisions.
  8. Limited technological capacity for real-time monitoring and tracking of illegal mining activities.
  9. Political interference in the enforcement of anti-galamsey policies.
  10. Inadequate funding for reclamation projects and environmental restoration.

Projections and Recommendations

  1. Strengthen Financial Oversight and Taxation Mechanisms: Implement more rigorous tax collection mechanisms within the mining sector, particularly among small-scale miners. This should include digital tracking of mining revenues to ensure compliance.

  2. Invest in Community Engagement and Education: Local communities should be more actively engaged in land use decisions, with a focus on educating them about the long-term effects of galamsey. Schools and local media should be mobilized to raise awareness about the importance of environmental preservation.

  3. Enhance Technological Capacity: The government should invest in drones, satellite surveillance, and real-time monitoring systems to improve enforcement efforts. This would help track illegal mining activities more efficiently and reduce reliance on manual operations.

  4. Judicial Reforms: Specialized environmental courts should be established to fast-track cases related to illegal mining. Convictions should carry more severe penalties to act as a stronger deterrent.

  5. Reclamation and Environmental Restoration Programs: Establish a national reclamation fund to restore lands affected by illegal mining. This fund should be financed through penalties imposed on illegal miners and supplemented by international environmental grants.

  6. Sustainable Economic Alternatives: Implement long-term economic programs that offer alternative livelihoods, such as sustainable agriculture, eco-tourism, and legal small-scale mining. These initiatives should receive continuous funding and support from both the government and private sectors.


Conclusion

A Balanced Scorecard analysis of Ghana’s galamsey problem under the 4th Republic reveals significant gaps across financial, citizen, internal process, and learning dimensions. Although efforts have been made to combat the issue, financial losses, environmental degradation, and weak enforcement remain persistent challenges. Addressing these gaps will require a more comprehensive approach that includes better financial oversight, community engagement, technological investment, and judicial reforms. By doing so, Ghana can mitigate the negative impacts of galamsey and foster sustainable development.


Notes

This article provides an expository and critical analysis of the galamsey problem in Ghana under the 4th Republic, focusing on the application of the Balanced Scorecard framework to assess performance gaps and provide actionable solutions.


Bibliography

  • Ghana Water Company, “Water Pollution Statistics Due to Illegal Mining,” 2022.
  • Minerals Commission, “The Impact of Small-Scale Mining in Ghana,” 2021.
  • IMF, “Illegal Mining and Revenue Losses in Ghana,” 2019.
  • Forestry Commission, “Ghana’s Forest Cover Loss,” 2020.
  • Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, “Ghana’s Anti-Galamsey Strategy: An Overview,” 2021.

SEO Metadata

  • Title: Balanced Scorecard Analysis of Ghana's Galamsey Problem under the 4th Republic
  • Meta Description: A critical analysis of Ghana's galamsey issue using the Balanced Scorecard framework. Explore the financial, environmental, and enforcement gaps and find solutions to address this national crisis.
  • Keywords: Ghana, galamsey, illegal mining, Balanced Scorecard, environmental impact, financial losses, legislative gaps, community engagement, technological investment.

You've Landed On Extra Crunch Exclusive

MonthlyMembershipTrial

AnnualMembershipSave $80

2 YearMembershipBest Deal

Membership Benefits

  • Curated Datasets.
  • Data-driven Economic and Political Intelligence.
  • Exclusive Insights (breaking news, Exposés and Investigative Research).
  • Full access to real-time Economic and Political Intelligence.
  • Curated dossiers.
  • Bespoke reports.
Additional Terms and Conditions Apply

MOST POPULAR

How Can We Help?

Please select a topic below related to your inquiry. if you don't find what you need, fill what you need, fill out contact form.

Contact Information

  • Anang Tawiah
    14 Wall Street Manhattan
    20th floor
    New York, NY 10005
  • +1 (551) 800-2125
  • info@anangtawiah.com